Kang ConsultingKC

Research mentorship

Research & Competition Coaching

Research mentorship for the project — and the applications it becomes

Coached by Daniel Kang — ISEF Best of Category winner — with three consecutive ISEF First Place winning mentees.

Help finding the research direction comes first. Students rarely stall on research because they lack ability — they stall because nobody showed them how a field narrows into a question they can answer, or what a fair actually rewards. The student brings the interest and learns the rest — Daniel Kang and Andrew Kang coach the project week by week, through the judging and into the application it becomes.

Early Decision deadlines close November 1; Regular Decision closes January 1.

Fit

Who this is for

This is for you if

  • The student is in 9th, 10th or 11th grade and wants to build or work on a project.
  • You want research to be the spine of the profile, not a line added late to fill a gap.
  • The help you want is on the work itself — the question, the method, the write-up — and on presenting it to judges.
  • Selective summer research programs are on the list, and you want those applications treated as their own project.
  • You want the founders coaching the weekly sessions themselves, an ISEF winner reading the work as it develops.

This is not for you if

  • You are looking to buy a finished project, a paper, or a lab placement on request. We coach the outreach and the work; we sell neither.

    Bring it to the consultation
  • Your budget sits below the published starting price of this engagement. Say so on the consultation rather than after it — we would rather point you somewhere useful than sell you the wrong thing.

    Bring it to the consultation

What you get

What the engagement includes

Research & Competition Coaching

Founder-led research and competition coaching on an annual engagement: research direction, project execution and science-fair strategy.

  • Up to two meetings a week with Daniel Kang, booked in advance, with replies within one to two business days
  • Research ideas brainstormed, evaluated and refined together
  • Methodology review and strategic feedback on the project
  • Competition-focused guidance and feedback on the research project
  • Research-plan review and feedback
  • Full access to Daniel's ISEF strategy and a detailed breakdown of how judging works
  • Full access to Daniel's research-mentor outreach strategy, used to help students secure research opportunities at Harvard, Stanford and UCLA labs
  • ISEF poster and presentation coaching
  • Mock judging sessions, unlimited as needed
  • Full ISEF competition coaching
  • Support for one additional major research program or competition application
  • Capped cohort capacity to preserve quality of support

How it runs

The process, week by week

  1. Consultation

    Direction before anything else

    Thirty minutes with Daniel Kang and Andrew Kang on what the student is genuinely interested in, what they have access to, and whether a research engagement is the right one.

  2. Scoping

    A question that can actually be run

    The student brings the field; we coach the narrowing until it is a question they can answer with the time, equipment and mentorship available — including the outreach plan when a lab is needed: who to contact, what to send, how to follow up.

  3. Build

    Run the project weekly

    Weekly sessions on experimental design, analysis and write-up, with the founders reviewing direction so months of work do not go into a dead end.

  4. Competition

    Prepare to be judged

    Abstract, poster and rehearsed answers, built against the rubric the fair actually uses rather than against what the student assumes judges want.

  5. Applications

    Turn the work into the application

    The project becomes the spine of the activities list, the supplements and the summer-program applications, instead of sitting in a folder nobody reads.

Engagements

What it costs

Research & Competition Coaching

Founder-led research and competition coaching on an annual engagement: research direction, project execution and science-fair strategy.

  • Up to two meetings a week with Daniel Kang, booked in advance, with replies within one to two business days
  • Research ideas brainstormed, evaluated and refined together
  • Methodology review and strategic feedback on the project
From $18,000
Annual Program

Early Decision deadlines close November 1; Regular Decision closes January 1. The engagement is planned around both. Start later and the ED portion is the part that gets compressed — the calendar does not move.

Also available: College Admissions Mentorship.

Outcomes

The numbers, and how they were measured

Our outcomes

Zero

prescreening — every student who applied was accepted for mentorship

53.1%

admitted to an Ivy League university

84.4%

admitted to a Top 20 university

40.6%

admitted to T5 / HYPSM

Based on 32 students who reported outcomes. One additional student did not report and is not included. Top 20 reflects an aggregate of the most recognized rankings. Tiers are nested — students admitted to HYPSM are also counted in Ivy League where applicable.

What the work looked like

  • RSI + HYPSM Admit

    Starting position
    A student who began working with Daniel three years out, across college admissions, research and essay writing.
    Constraint
    The whole profile had to be built rather than polished: extracurriculars and research alongside the application itself.
    What we did
    Built world-class extracurriculars — RSI and grand awards at ISEF — then crafted the application meticulously from start to finish.
    Result
    Admitted to Harvard, Yale, Stanford and MIT.
    I worked with Daniel for 3 years and he is literally the best bar none when it comes to college admissions, research and writing essays. Not only did he help me get world-class extracurriculars such as RSI and grand awards at ISEF, he meticulously helped craft my application from start to finish. Through his irreplaceable help, I was admitted to Harvard, Yale, Stanford and MIT.
    Aaditya SahaHarvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT Admit | RSI | ISEF Grand Awards
  • UPenn M&TSI Admit

    Starting position
    Knew little about summer programs, and was about to apply to an expensive pre-collegiate one.
    Constraint
    Late to the game as a junior.
    What we did
    Introduced him to top-tier programs like RSI, SSP and M&TSI, then worked the M&TSI application — essay and video — in a few sessions.
    Result
    Admitted to UPenn M&TSI.
    I didn't know much about summer programs and was about to apply to an expensive pre-collegiate one before I found Daniel. He completely changed my perspective. Even though I was late to the game as a junior, he introduced me to top-tier programs like RSI, SSP, and M&TSI. I had no clue how to approach the M&TSI application -- but after just a few sessions with Daniel, I crafted a strong essay and video and got in! He's genuinely the GOAT for this stuff.
    Viraj KamathAdmitted to UPenn M&TSI | Class of 2025

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Do you place students in labs?
We coach the outreach — who to contact, what to send, how to follow up — and prepare the student to be useful once they are in one. We do not sell placements, and we will not pretend a placement is ours to hand over.
Who coaches the research?
Daniel Kang and Andrew Kang lead every engagement and stay hands-on in the weekly work — an ISEF winner reading the experimental design, the analysis and the write-up as they develop, rather than a hand-off once the direction is set.
Can you promise an ISEF or competition result?
No. Fair results belong to the judges. No one can promise a competition result, and we don't. What we commit to is the work described on this page, done every week, with named people accountable for it. The outcomes we publish appear on this page alongside the methodology behind them.
When should a student start?
Before the application cycle rather than during it. A project needs a full run — question, experiments, write-up — before it is something to present to judges or write about in an application.
Is this only useful for ISEF?
No. The same work supports affiliated science fairs, selective summer research programs, and the research portion of a college application. ISEF is the sharpest test of it, not the only use of it.
How many students do you take at once?
Capped cohort capacity to preserve quality of support. That is a limit on how many engagements run at the same time, not a scarcity tactic — we do not publish a number. If we cannot take a student, we say so on the consultation rather than after it.
What happens on the consultation?
Thirty minutes with Daniel Kang and Andrew Kang. We go through where the student stands, the time left and what they want, and end with a plain recommendation — including, when it is the right answer, the recommendation not to work with us.

Next step

Bring the interest; we shape the project together

Thirty minutes with the founders to work out whether there is a project worth running here, what it would take, and how the year around it would go.